Business International Latest News

AT&T plans to cut 3,400 jobs, shuts down 250 stores

San Francisco: AT&T plans to cut over 3,400 technician and clerical jobs across the country over the next few weeks, the US wireless carrier has informed its main labour union, the Communications Workers of America.

In addition, the company plans to permanently shutter over 250 AT&T Mobility and Cricket Wireless stores, impacting 1,300 retail jobs, CWA said.

These cuts come amid devastations caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

“AT&T could help lead the country toward recovery by partnering with its workforce to build next generation networks. Instead the company is adding to the pain of the recession already underway,” CWA President Chris Shelton said in a statement.

The employees who will be impacted by the job cuts will receive severance pay and health insurance coverage for up to six months, according to AT&T, CNET reported.

The impacted retail employees will receive the offer of another position at the company, said the report.

“I want to know where these jobs are going,” said Joe Snyder, President of CWA Local 4302 in Akron, Ohio who has been an AT&T technician for 25 years.

“From where we sit, it looks like AT&T is pushing the work to low-paid contractors who do not have the same training, experience, and commitment as CWA members. The money they are saving goes into the pockets of wealthy shareholders looking for short-term profits instead of staying here in our communities.”

Read More
coronavirus India Latest News

Indian govt takes U-turn on wages in lockdown

New Delhi: In a U-turn, the Indian government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that payment of wages during the lockdown is a matter between the employer and employees, and the notification on wages was issued to prevent human suffering.

On the contrary, the Center had directed the employers on the full-payment of wages during the lockdown, and sought direction from the top court for the companies to furnish proof of their incapacity to pay wages and salaries in terms of the March 29 order, by placing on record their audited balance sheets and account.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, S K Kaul and M R Shah queried Attorney General, K K Venugopal representing the Center, “You have put forth payment of 100 per cent (wages). Question is, do you have power to get them (companies) pay 100 per cent and on their failure to do, prosecute them?”

Venugopal insisted that the notification was to keep the workers stay put, and they would only stay, if they are paid. He added that the Centre wanted the economy to restart and the employers can negotiate with employees to settle the amount in wages during the lockdown. The apex court has reserved the order for June 12, and says there would be no coercive action against employers in connection with March 29 Home Ministry notification.

The top court observed that there can be negotiation industry-wise, and the government can play a role of a facilitator in this process. The bench pointed out there is a concern that workers should not be left without pay, but the other concern is that in the industry many employers do not have money to pay.

“You have to balance between the two sides”, the bench told the A-G. Venugopal replied under the Industrial Disputes Act, conciliation and settlement exists, and the most appropriate thing would be to consider the humanitarian situation, due to which this order was issued. The bench queried the A-G on a prayer of companies, which asked the government to subsidise the wages from various relief funds.

Venugopal replied that the government already infused Rs 20,000 crore in the MSME sector. “The Center has done a very good job”, said A-G.

On the ESI funds, the A-G said it cannot be redirected, instead companies can borrow; and the notification does not restrict. “Main objective was that if they get paid, they need not migrate”, said the A-G.

The Center in an affidavit said March 29 notification on full payment of wages to workers by their employers during the lockdown was not unconstitutional, instead it was a measure taken to prevent perpetration of financial crisis within the lower strata of the society, labourers and salaried employees.

Read More